In Curtis Blough v. Holland Realty, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a per se tying claim alleging the tying of realtor services for development to the purchase of undeveloped lots. The court held that even if a tie were shown, the plaintiffs could not prevail because there was no market for the alledged tied product and thus a substantial amount of commerce was not affected.
Ninth Circuit Throws Out Tying Claim for Failure to Affect a Substantial Volume of Commerce
This entry was posted on August 7, 2009 at 12:39 pm, filed under Tying Claims, US Federal Courts. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
3 Comments